UPDATED: Change in Malpractice Law
- jgross76
- Mar 31, 2015
- 1 min read
Change in malpractice from September 3, 2014
On Friday, March 27, 2015, the Georgia Supreme Court issued its decision in Gala v. Fisher, an appeal involving the issue of whether a plaintiff in a malpractice lawsuit can cure a defective expert affidavit by filing the affidavit of a new expert.
In a relatively brief opinion, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the holding of the Georgia Court of Appeals confirming that a plaintiff asserting a malpractice claim can replace a defective affidavit with an affidavit from a different expert. Justice Hines, writing for the Court, noted that the cure provision of O.C.G.A. § 9-11-9.1(e) does not contain a express limitation on how a plaintiff can cure a defect and a liberal reading of the cure provision is consistent with the general liberality of pleadings under the
Georgia Civil Practice Act and does not detract from the purpose of the statute.
In theory, this ruling allows plaintiffs to have the proverbial “second bite of the apple,” since they can file a lawsuit with a defective affidavit and, if challenged, find a new or additional expert to support their claims. In reality, however, the decision does not change the qualifications of an expert necessary to support a malpractice claim and a plaintiff must still find an expert meeting the statutory requirements or face dismissal of his claims.
Recent Posts
See AllIn the case of Cook-Rose v. Waffle House Inc.. et al. , the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed the issue of weather a trial court’s order...
In the case of Frett v. State Farm Employee Workers' Compensation , the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed the issue of whether a...
A grand jury had issued two subpoenas to an accounting firm and an investment company in connection with a suspected illegal tax-shelter...
Comments